Amazon S3
2 alternatives — 2 medium
Why people leave Amazon S3
- Egress fees can be surprisingly expensive
- Complex pricing model with many dimensions
- Vendor lock-in with AWS ecosystem
- Data sovereignty concerns depending on region
Comparison
| App | Difficulty | RAM | Docker | Mobile | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MinIO High-performance S3-compatible object storage server. Community repo archived February 2026 — MinIO moved to commercial-only model. | medium | 1GB | — | — | Stale | |
| RustFS High-performance S3-compatible object storage written in Rust. Community successor to MinIO with better performance on small objects. | medium | 1GB | — | — | Active |
Detailed Look
MinIO Top Pick
High-performance S3-compatible object storage server. Community repo archived February 2026 — MinIO moved to commercial-only model.
Pros
- + Full S3 API compatibility
- + Very high performance
- + Simple single-binary deployment
- + Good for backing other self-hosted apps
Cons
- - AGPL license may concern some users
- - Enterprise features require commercial license
- - Not a general-purpose file server
- - Erasure coding requires multiple drives
RustFS
High-performance S3-compatible object storage written in Rust. Community successor to MinIO with better performance on small objects.
Pros
- + Significantly faster than MinIO for small object workloads
- + S3-compatible API with migration path from MinIO
- + Apache-2.0 license avoids AGPL concerns
- + Written in Rust for memory safety and performance
Cons
- - Newer project with less battle-testing than MinIO
- - Smaller ecosystem and community
- - Some S3 features still being implemented
- - Documentation is still maturing
Can't decide? Compare MinIO, RustFS side by side →