1Password
4 alternatives — 1 easy, 2 medium, 1 hard
1Password moved to a subscription-only model and removed local vault support. These self-hosted password managers let you keep your credentials on your own server with full Bitwarden client compatibility.
Why people leave 1Password
- Subscription-only model replaced perpetual licenses
- Cloud-only architecture removed local vault option
- Pricing increases with each tier change
- No self-hosted option available
Comparison
| App | Difficulty | RAM | Docker | Mobile | Status | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infisical Open-source platform for secrets, certificates, and privileged access management. | medium | 1GB | — | Active | ||
| OpenBao Open-source secrets, certificates, and key management platform forked from HashiCorp Vault. | hard | 1GB | — | Active | ||
| Passbolt Team-oriented open-source password manager with strong access controls. | medium | 1GB | — | Active | ||
| Vaultwarden Lightweight Bitwarden-compatible password manager server written in Rust. | easy | 0.1GB | — | iOS & Android | Active |
Detailed Look
Infisical Top Pick
Open-source platform for secrets, certificates, and privileged access management.
Pros
- + Developer-friendly secrets management UI and CLI
- + Good integrations for app and CI/CD secret delivery
- + Easier team workflow than raw Vault-style tools
Cons
- - Open-core feature boundaries should be reviewed
- - Requires careful backup and access control
- - Less general-purpose than OpenBao for deep infrastructure workflows
OpenBao
Open-source secrets, certificates, and key management platform forked from HashiCorp Vault.
Pros
- + Open governance path for Vault-compatible secrets workflows
- + Dynamic secrets, PKI, encryption, and policy controls
- + Strong fit for infrastructure and app secret management
Cons
- - Operationally sensitive and requires backup/unseal planning
- - Overkill for personal password management
- - Teams need to understand policies and secret engines
Passbolt
Team-oriented open-source password manager with strong access controls.
Pros
- + Great for teams
- + Browser extension works well
- + Strong access control
- + Security audited
Cons
- - No mobile app in CE
- - More complex setup
- - Some features require paid plan
Vaultwarden
Lightweight Bitwarden-compatible password manager server written in Rust.
Pros
- + Extremely lightweight
- + Full Bitwarden client compatibility
- + Easy to deploy
- + Very low resource usage
Cons
- - Single developer project
- - Not official Bitwarden
- - Emergency access features limited
FAQ
What is the best self-hosted 1Password alternative?
Vaultwarden is the most popular choice — it's a lightweight Rust implementation of the Bitwarden server API. It works with all official Bitwarden apps and browser extensions, uses minimal resources, and is easy to deploy with Docker.
Is Vaultwarden as secure as 1Password?
Vaultwarden uses the same encryption as Bitwarden (AES-256, PBKDF2/Argon2). The main difference is you're responsible for server security, backups, and updates. If your server is properly secured with HTTPS and regular updates, it's comparable.
Can I migrate from 1Password to Vaultwarden?
Yes. Export your 1Password vault as a CSV or 1PUX file, then import it into Vaultwarden through the Bitwarden web vault. Most data transfers cleanly, though some custom fields may need manual adjustment.
Can't decide? Compare Infisical, OpenBao, Passbolt side by side →